|
Syllabus Rich Julius and Freda Salatino
|
||||||||
| Objectives | Introduction
Information Architecture is described by Richard Saul Wurman as "the structure or map of information which allows others to seek their personal paths to knowledge." Today, the book is still the most common paradigm for collecting and organizing large amounts of text and graphics-based information. But the book, while well suited to narrative, was never well suited to the task of delivering reference information of the type used in technical documentation, catalogues, or encyclopedias. Information architecture
teaches methods for liberating both the author and the information user
from the constraints of a linear, book-centric information hierarchy. It
suggests multiple entry paths that accommodate many ways of thinking about
information, as opposed to the single hierarchy presented by a table of
contents. It considers relational and object database technology, rather
than simple desktop publishing tools, enabling the creation of database-driven
"virtual books." And it offers Boolean, multidimensional, and visual text
search, as an alternative to the traditional index.
|
|||||||
| Introduction | Objectives
Principles of Information Architecture focuses on design, organizational, and human interface elements of information delivery and knowledge systems. Class participants will discover the underlying principles of document and database-driven information structures, as well as electronic methods for communicating technical information. This course is designed to explore issues in user-centered information development, design, and deployment. Participants will learn how to structure technical information so that it can be delivered in a variety of media, from print to CD-ROM and the Web. They will also learn to evaluate which delivery medium best suits their material. This course is intended for
technical communicators and information architects seeking to transform
the way knowledge is stored, transmitted, and maintained within their organizations.
Students will discover strategies for improving the usability of the information
delivery system, improving the time it takes for users to find answers,
reducing the effort to maintain the knowledge base, decreasing information
delivery costs, and increasing the value of corporate information assets.
|
|||||||
| Introduction | Instructional
Methods
Although it is certainly possible to learn how to think about information architecture in a classroom setting, real-world implementation of any technical communication scheme requires the endorsement of other corporate departments. The instructional methods used in this course are designed to foster both judgment in selecting the right knowledge design scheme and delivery medium, and the skills required to make the implementation of that scheme successful. Lectures: The instructors will begin the class with a lecture on techniques and models used in technical communication, according to the course outline described in the following section. Instructors will bring in a computer (or sample screen printouts) for product and technology demonstrations. The instructors will also provide case studies of how these techniques were used in the industry, considering successes, failures, and innovations. Where appropriate, technical writing samples from Bay Area companies will be available for evaluation and comment. Class Discussion: The class will discuss the topics and techniques presented in each session, particularly as they relate to audience, purpose, medium, technical industry, and other appropriate variables. They will be encouraged to consider examples, alternative methods, improvements, and exceptions. Workshops: In the second class of the term, the class will be divided into groups. Each group will simulate a different type of company that might make use of information architecture techniques. The instructors will give the groups a problem, inspired by that week’s lecture. Each group will devise a strategy for addressing this issue within their own "company," paying special attention to the dependencies of the various departments represented. The work performed in these groups will form the basis for the term projects. The groups will chronicle their weekly solutions to the problems posed in class, and present them during the last class of the term. Materials: Students are expected to conduct as much of their class business as possible through email and the Web. The class administrative web site at http://www.movingfinger.net/pia1999 will include an HTML version of this syllabus, a calendar of classes, an evolving list of Frequently Asked Questions about this class, and a compendium of online resources contributed by past and present class participants (URLs for Would-be Knowledge Engineers, http://www.movingfinger.net/urlindx.htm). It will also provide access to the class’s secure project site (URL to be provided). The course syllabus will
be handed out in hardcopy form on the first night of class. A limited number
of handouts and copies of instructor presentations will be available in
class the night of the subject lecture. Links to presentations given
in class, or web sites discussed in class, will be posted on the class
calendar by Friday of that week’s lecture.
|
|||||||
| Introduction | Outline
of Weekly Content
Class 1: Introduction (Rich and Freda)
Class 9: Mini-lectures (Rich and Freda)
The groups will present and
critique each other’s term projects.
|
|||||||
| Introduction | Readings
Maher, M.L. and Gomez de
Silva Garza, A: "Case-Based Reasoning in Design" http://www.arch.su.edu.au/~andres/cbd.html
|
|||||||
| Introduction |
Grading/Group ProjectShort writing assignments on topics introduced in class (3 @10%) 30%
Term Project 60% The term project is an information system designed to provide hands-on experience in, and a real-world context for, aspects of information architecture discussed in the course. Because real-world information systems are typically developed by cross-functional teams, the term project is conducted by groups of 4-5 class participants. Each member works in an explicit role (for example, HTML author, project manager, interface designer, graphic designer) according to their interests and talents. You will receive both an overall group grade, and an individual grade on your own contribution. Each group will simulate
a different type of company that might make use of information architecture
The initial criteria are:
We expect you to maintain a project log or "lessons learned" document, to keep track of the issues that surfaced and the methods you employed to overcome challenges. This log will be a key part of your final project presentation. DeliverablesThe term project represents 60% of your grade. It should consist of the following elements:
on an individual basis for work performed, so if you want a good grade, please do your share. (If you are planning to take the class pass/fail or not-for-credit, please let your group know, so you can set reasonable expectations.) Feel free to discuss any problems or concerns you have with Rich or Freda. |
|||||||
| Introduction | Instructors
Rich Julius, MFA., is currently responsible for module development at MS2, Inc., an enterprise application software startup. He was previously Director of Solutions Marketing for Perspecta, Inc., an information architecture firm specializing in systems that help you discover information on the Web. Rich has more than twelve years of experience as a technical communicator, including previous positions as Director of Knowledge Systems at Informix Software, Director of User Assistance at Oracle Corporation, and Documentation Project Manager at PeopleSoft. Rich has taught in UC Berkeley Extension Engineering and Technical Communications programs since 1995, and has taught writing at the University of Michigan and City College of San Francisco. He served for three terms as President of the Berkeley Chapter of the Society for Technical Communication, and was Internet Committee Chair for STC International, 1995-96. Freda Salatino has been a technical communicator for over 14 years, specializing in information architecture and publications management. Her technical experience includes projects in CBR systems, Web/multimedia applications, SQL/relational databases, and network communications. Her management experience includes stints at Xerox, Informix, and Oracle – where she was one of the founding members of Oracle’s Documentation Architecture Review Board. Freda has taught in UC Berkeley Extension Engineering and Technical Communications program since 1996; related career digressions run the gamut from editing scientific journal articles to writing advertising copy on New York’s Madison Avenue. She is currently Manager,
Technical Communication, for Luminate Software.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||